download 11

Jacob Zuma’s lawyers argued on Monday that the former South African president had been treated unfairly by prosecutors in his attempt to have revived corruption charges set aside because he is unpopular in the country at large.

Zuma, who was in office from 2009-2018, has applied for a permanent stay of prosecution from 16 charges of fraud, racketeering and money laundering relating to a deal to buy 30 billion rand (1.6 billion pounds) of European military hardware for South Africa’s armed forces in the late 1990s.

The 77-year old, appearing in court on Monday for the fifth time since the charges were reinstated in March 2018, has previously denied any wrongdoing and has said he is the victim of a politically motivated witch-hunt.

On the first day of the hearing, Zuma’s lawyer, Advocate Muzi Sikhakhane, described the former president’s treatment by the National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) as “mob justice” and said Zuma had been charged because the country does not like him.

“Suppose we know that he may well have done what we suspect he did. Does he get stripped of human dignity, is there a reason to deal with him in a particular way because he is Mr Zuma?” Sikhakhane said in his opening comments.

He accused prosecutors of being biased against Zuma, who was ousted by the ruling African National Congress (ANC) in February 2018 after nine years in power marked by graft allegations and economic stagnation that led to credit rating downgrades.

Sikhakhane also asked the court to consider transcripts of so-called “spy tapes”, which he said provided further evidence of political interference used to charge Zuma.

His other lawyer, Thabani Masuku, said the application was not an attack on the NPA, but a defence of Zuma’s rights.

“They themselves (NPA) in their own words, from their own mouths, (said they) were wrong in the way they’ve dealt with the Zuma prosecution,” Masuku told the court, citing the NPA’s affidavits.


The defence and the state agreed on Monday morning to postpone the case against Zuma and co-accused French arms company Thales, setting Oct. 15 as a holding date pending judgement on the application for a permanent stay of prosecution.

Zuma’s lawyers also argued that there have been unreasonable delays to Zuma’s case that could lead to him not receiving a fair trial.

In a statement on Sunday, Thales expressed a similar view, saying it believed “it cannot obtain a fair trial” because of the very long delay of the case, together with a range of factors beyond its control…

By Ian Dei

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.